Mental health risk increases for COVID-19 survivors

Mental health risk increases for COVID-19 survivors

Green and red overlayed images of someone's head in portraitShare on Pinterest
Mental health risk increases even after mild COVID-19. Jonathan Knowles/Getty Images
  • A study tracking COVID-19 survivors found them more likely to develop mental health issues than other people over the year following diagnosis.
  • The researchers saw an increased risk even for those whose COVID-19 was mild enough that they did not require hospitalization.
  • Conditions the researchers investigated included anxiety, depression, opioid use, and cognitive decline.

Researchers continue to investigate the long-term health effects of COVID-19, or “long COVID.”

Using databases from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), a new study catalogs a range of mental health issues in the 12 months following a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The study finds that people who have survived COVID-19 are at increased risk of mental health issues in the first year after the illness.

The study’s senior investigator is Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, chief of research and development service at the VA Saint Louis Health Care System and a clinical epidemiologist and assistant professor at Washington University in St. Louis. In an opinion piece published alongside the research, he says:

“The body of evidence on long COVID — from our work and others — suggests the need to reframe our thinking about SARS-CoV-2. It is not only a respiratory virus; it is a systemic virus that may provoke damage and clinical consequences in nearly every organ system — including mental health disorders and neurocognitive decline.”

Psychiatrist Dr. Maura Boldrini of Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York City is the lead author of the article “How COVID-19 Affects the Brain.” She commented on the new study for Medical News Today:

“This is a large study that sheds light on the prevalence of symptoms that reflect brain involvement in post-COVID patients. These symptoms can be classified by the [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders] into psychiatric categories, but their pathogenesis is unknown.”

Dr. Noortje Uphoff is a research fellow at the University of York in the United Kingdom and the lead author of a related review published in August 2021.

“The strengths of the study,” Dr. Uphoff told MNT, “are that many patients are included, COVID-19 patients are compared to people without evidence of the infection, and data were collected for a year. Whereas many studies measure mental health outcomes such as self-reported symptoms, in this study, medical records of diagnoses and prescriptions were used.”

The new study appears in the BMJ. Neither Dr. Boldrini nor Dr. Uphoff was involved in the new study.

The researchers analyzed health data from 153,848 veterans who had survived 30 days or more after receiving a positive PCR test result between March 1, 2020, and January 15, 2021. The research team followed their health until November 30, 2021.

The researchers also collected data from two control groups: 5,637,840 veterans who had not contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the same period, and 5,859,251 individuals who used the Veterans Health Administration during a period before the pandemic.

Dr. Uphoff cautioned MNT:

“As the study authors point out, their study sample was not representative of populations across the world. These were retired veterans, mostly white men, who had access to healthcare.”

The authors of the study calculated the post-COVID-19 incidence of developing various mental health issues by comparing outcomes for COVID-19 survivors with those of the control groups.

The overall risk of developing any mental health issue increased to 64.38 additional cases per 1,000 people after 1 year.

The researchers reported the following increased risk of incident mental health cases per 1,000 people in the year following COVID-19:

  • anxiety disorders: 11.06 additional cases
  • depressive disorders: 15.12 additional cases
  • stress and adjustment disorders: 13.29 additional cases
  • use of antidepressants: 21.59 additional cases
  • use of benzodiazepines: 10.46 additional cases
  • opioid prescriptions: 35.90 additional cases
  • opioid use disorders: 0.96 additional cases
  • other (non-opioid) substance use disorders: 4.34 additional cases
  • neurocognitive decline: 10.75 additional cases
  • sleep disorders: 23.80 additional cases.

While risks were higher for those hospitalized for COVID-19, the study also found that “risks were evident even among those who were not admitted to hospital during the acute phase of COVID-19.”

“The symptoms are most likely due to brain inflammation,” said Dr. Boldrini.

“We know brain inflammation is present in major depressive disorder and dementias,” she continued, “and brain symptoms are found in other inflammatory diseases like [systemic lupus erythematosus]. Even in people with mild COVID-19, there can be a protracted inflammatory response that disrupts brain vasculature and neurotransmitters synthesis, including serotonin.”

Dr. Uphoff suggested stress as an additional potential factor, saying, “It is easy to imagine why infection with [SARS-CoV-2] could cause distress.”

Dr. Uphoff added: “Not only do many patients experience symptoms of illness, ranging from inconvenient to severe, but self-isolation at home causes disruption to people’s lives. On top of this, worries about passing on the infection to loved ones and about the potential severity of the illness are likely to affect well-being at least in the short term.”

“As physicians,” said Dr. Boldrini, “we need to understand better the mechanisms of vascular strokes and protracted inflammation and their damage in the brain so that we can repair it.”

Dr. Boldrini concluded with a plea for help:

“As patients, I would encourage people to volunteer for research studies — clinical and brain imaging ones — and in the event of death, it is crucial that families donate the brain to research so we can study it. Medicine has made the most progress [studying] human organs after death. That’s what we do in my lab. We need brains to be donated so we can understand mechanisms of brain disorders and find new treatments.”

Moderna booster shot increases antibody levels against Omicron, company says

At this time, Moderna’s booster is administered as a 50-microgram dose. The business announcement noted that this dose elevated antibody concentrations 37-fold, as opposed with the amounts seen when a fully vaccinated particular person does not get a booster, and a 100-microgram dose greater antibody amounts 83-fold.

It remains unclear what these boosts imply as far as how well the booster doses clinically do the job towards Omicron.

“The remarkable raise in COVID-19 conditions from the Omicron variant is about to all. Nonetheless, these knowledge demonstrating that the currently licensed Moderna COVID-19 booster can strengthen neutralizing antibody ranges 37-fold higher than pre-boost amounts are reassuring,” Bancel mentioned.

'Boost everybody.' CEOs should mandate boosters before returning office workers, Andy Slavitt says

“To react to this remarkably transmissible variant, Moderna will keep on to rapidly progress an Omicron-specific booster applicant into medical tests in scenario it becomes necessary in the long run. We will also continue to produce and share data throughout our booster tactics with community health and fitness authorities to help them make evidence-based mostly conclusions on the very best vaccination procedures versus SARS-CoV-2.”

SARS-CoV-2 is the title of the coronavirus that triggers Covid-19.

It’s now up to US general public overall health authorities to contemplate no matter if Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine booster should really be specified at a larger dose, Dr. Stephen Hoge, president of the corporation, reported Monday.

“The selection of no matter if to deploy 100 micrograms or a better dose is seriously just one for public overall health organizations at this issue. We are just offering the information, and naturally we will share it with all people so that they can make that resolve,” Hoge stated through a enterprise meeting connect with.

Moderna spokesperson Colleen Hussey confirmed to CNN in an emailed assertion Monday that the firm is “sharing the data with regulators as they get started to evaluate if any adjustments to the authorized boosters will need to be created.”

Moderna’s present-day coronavirus vaccine booster is approved for emergency use for people today 18 and more mature in the United States and supplied as a fifty percent-dose at 50 micrograms, and it’s licensed at the 100-microgram dose for people today who are seriously immunocompromised, the assertion mentioned.

According to the US Facilities for Ailment Control and Prevention, about 32{cfdf3f5372635aeb15fd3e2aecc7cb5d7150695e02bd72e0a44f1581164ad809} of absolutely vaccinated adults — almost 60 million people today — have gotten a booster dose. Additional than 26.7 million of them have received a Moderna booster, in accordance to CDC details.

Separately, “we’re going to carry on to progress an Omicron-certain booster into medical trials in early 2022,” Hoge said Monday.

Covid-19 booster pictures can assist improve protection towards the Omicron coronavirus variant, and there is no will need for a variant-unique booster dose at this time, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the Nationwide Institute of Allergy and Infectious Ailments, said previous 7 days.

“A amount of experiments have been accomplished during the state and the world to take a glimpse at how we may get ready in the context of vaccinations,” Fauci claimed.

“The information remains crystal clear: If you are unvaccinated, get vaccinated,” included Fauci, the chief healthcare adviser to President Biden. “And especially in the arena of Omicron, if you are fully vaccinated, get your booster shot.”

Pandemic increases mortality risk for people with mental health issues

healthcare worker walking quickly through a hospital corridorShare on Pinterest
The pandemic increased mortality rates in people with mental health issues compared with people without. JGI/Tom Grill/Getty Images
  • A study finds that people with mental health issues or intellectual disabilities have been far more likely to die during the pandemic than others.
  • More people in these groups have died of COVID-19 and other causes.
  • There are likely several reasons for this disparity.

According to a new study, people in the U.K. with mental health issues and intellectual disabilities were at about twice the risk of dying than people without those conditions before the COVID-19 pandemic.

The study suggests this difference has increased dramatically during the pandemic, with people with mental health conditions and intellectual disabilities experiencing much higher death rates.

The current study considered “excess deaths,” a general category of deaths during a particular period compared with historical levels.

Says the study’s lead author, Dr. Jayati Das-Munshi of King’s College London in the United Kingdom:

“The results from our study paint a stark picture of how the existing vulnerability of those with mental health conditions and intellectual disabilities has worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. The higher death rates compared [with] the general population were associated with more deaths from [SARS-CoV-2] infection itself, as well as deaths from other causes.”

Dr. Thomas F. Betzler, executive clinical director of the Montefiore Behavioral Health Center in New York, who was not involved in the study, confirmed for Medical News Today that “many of our patients have similar issues.”

Dr. Das-Munshi says the study’s findings warrant a reappraisal of the groups understood to be at high risk of dying from COVID-19:

“People living with severe mental health conditions and intellectual disabilities should be considered a vulnerable group at risk of COVID-19 mortality — as well as deaths from other causes — throughout the pandemic. We suggest a need to prioritize vaccination and optimize physical healthcare and suicide risk reduction before, during, and after peaks of [SARS-CoV-2] infection in people living with mental health conditions.”

The study appears in The Lancet Regional Health Europe.

The study’s analysis found an increased likelihood of dying among people with mental health issues and intellectual disabilities in the U.K. during the first COVID-19 lockdown compared with the general population.

Specifically, they found that:

  • People with intellectual disabilities were 9.24 times more likely to die of COVID-19.
  • People with eating disorders were 4.81 times more likely to die of COVID-19.
  • People with dementia were 3.82 times more likely to die of COVID-19.
  • People with personality disorders were 4.58 times more likely to die of COVID-19.
  • People with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were 3.26 times more likely to die of COVID-19.

These groups experienced a brief respite, relatively speaking, from July to September 2020 during a temporary drop in COVID-19 cases. During these months, their risk returned to the pre-pandemic, already doubled, chances of mortality.

MNT asked Holly Kathryn Tabor, Ph.D., an associate professor of medicine at Stanford University, California — who was not involved in the study — why this disparity occurs. She replied that there are likely several reasons.

“It’s very hard for adults with intellectual disabilities to get access to basic healthcare and to other things that are social determinants of health, and they have much poorer health overall,” said Dr. Tabor.

Dr. Tabor also explained that the conditions cited by the study:

“All require you to be able to have a care provider and go get help from them, and also have a safety net. Your care provider isn’t going to do everything for you. You have to have people taking care of you and looking in on you. Health is more than just getting a prescription. Health is more than going to the doctor when you have a heart attack. Health is a lot of other things, and […] because of those conditions, all those people need help getting to a doctor.”

Dr. Betzler pointed out that these groups often experience “medical comorbidities, delayed or poor access to healthcare, living in a group or congregate care setting, and psychiatric hospitalizations.”

Joseph A. Stramondo, Ph.D., another expert not involved in the study, focuses on the intersection of the philosophy of disability and bioethics at San Diego State University.

Dr. Stramondo told MNT about the often damaging effect of institutionalization on some people in these groups. He recalled the 1972 TV exposé of the Willowbrook State School on New York’s Staten Island.

In that coverage, he said, “you just saw horrifying living conditions, and so it’s no wonder that there’s going to be increased mortality for disabled people living in these places.”

An additional factor may be triage decisions regarding who doctors treat. Early in the pandemic, hospitals in the United States had to devise “crisis standards of care.”

A number of these policies contained language that either overtly or indirectly excluded people with mental health issues or intellectual disabilities, leaving disability advocates “completely justifiably” angry, said Dr. Tabor.

Dr. Stramondo told MNT that the attitudes embodied in discriminatory policies “are fundamentally about disvaluing disabled lives.”

He explained: ”There is this presumption that they have a lower quality of life – that there ought to be less effort put into preserving their lives. And I think that we see that over and over again in various contexts.”

However, according to Dr. Tabor, “The advocacy groups and the attorneys generally succeeded in getting most crisis standards of care policies to have at least the explicit and very often the implicit discriminatory language taken out.”

“But,” she cautioned, “a policy is only as good as the people who are implementing it and hopefully doing it right.” So far, only a few states have officially implemented their crisis standards of care policies.

The disparities before and during the pandemic are “a judgment on our society,” Dr. Tabor said. “And the fact that the people who are the least well-off in our society also have the poorest health [is] just magnified with COVID-19.”

Dr. Tabor noted that “the ways in which our society is ableist and discriminatory against people with disabilities — that those [biases] existed in the first place pre-pandemic — is a sign and symptom of what already exists in society. And it’s appalling and needs to change, absolutely.”